Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43685 (AP)

Muqthar Ahmed S/o. Khaja Hussain, v. The Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board,

WP/15429/2016 · 2025-02-02

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE " o A/ PRESENT A THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15429 OF 2016 Between: Muqthar Ahmed S/o. Khaja Hussain, R/o. H.No. 34/77, Chatribagh Street, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, Razzaq Manzil, Opposite to Public Gardens, Nampally, Hyderabad. The Inspector - Auditor Waqf, The Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. Syed Ilyas Hussain S/o. Syed Ryder Hussain, Occ: Business, Permanent resident of Hyderabad, temporary residing at Door No. 22/38, Segmandi Street, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. 1. 2. 3. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1 respondent in taking steps to appoint 3'^^ Respondent as Mutawalli of Waqf namely Masjid-e-Maroof Peer and Dargah situatd at Sagmandi Street, Kurnool City, during the pendency of the enquiry against him, as, arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional. St m I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 19120 OF 2016) /'Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances Jtg^d, ih |he affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be f fly^eased to direct the 1®* Respondent not to appoint the 3'"^ respondent as lyiutavy^lli of Waqf namely Masjid - e- Maroof Peer and Dargah situated at Sagmandi Street, Kurnool City, pending disposal of the above said Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S.ARIFULLAH, SC FOR AP WAQF BOARD The Court made the following: ORDER m EL / % \j APHC010164062016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY .THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 15429/2016 Between: Muqthar Ahmed S/o. Khaja Hussain ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh State Waqf Board and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1.MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.S ARIFULLAH (SC FOR AP WAQF BOARD) The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.Raja Mouli, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioner submits that the the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes cause in infructuous. Recording the said submission, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. V There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/-B.PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. One CC to Sri Mohd Islamuddin Ansari, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri S.Arifullah, SC for APWAQF Board. [OPUC] Three CD Copies. 2. 3. gi HIGH COURT DATED:03/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.15429 of 2016 2 3 MAY 2025 ^ . Current Section . ^SesPATCtt^-'* DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS