[2025:RJ-JP:42421] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11818/2025 Gaurav Sharma S/o Shri Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Mohalla Bheekam Saiyed, Near Pawan Bag Store Alwar, Rajasthan 301001. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Technical Education, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Directorate General Of Training And Employment, Through Director, Metro Pillar Number 95, Directorate General Of Training, Ministry Of Skill Development And Entrepreneurs B-2, Kaushal Bhawan, Pusa Road, Karol Bagh, Opposite, New Delhi, Delhi 110005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ petition has been squarely covered by the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in case of Komal Kumawat & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16312/2024) passed on 28.05.2025. 2. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a [2025:RJ-JP:42421] (2 of 2) [CW-11818/2025] period of two weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation, in light of statement made by learned AAG in case of Komal Kumawat & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. (supra) and reproduced in para 67 of the said judgment. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /245