SRI VEERABHADRESHWARA TRADERS v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/100911/2025 · 2025-03-10
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43670 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43670 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4453 WP No. 100911 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100911 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. VEERABHADRESHWARA TRADERS, 01, SORABA MAIN ROAD, SORABA, KARNATAKA-577 429.
REP. BY PROPRIETOR SRI.RAMAPPA DHARMAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
2.
SRI. SAI TRADER BELURU, POST BELURU, SAGARA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-577 401.
REP. BY PROPRIETRIX-SMT. ASHWINI.
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NATARAJA BALLAL., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT FOR WELFARE OF BACKWARD CLASSES, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE, 16-D, 3RD FLOOR, DEVRAJ URS BHAVAN, MILLERS TANK BED AREA, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 001.
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4453 WP No. 100911 of 2025
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, AND CHAIRMAN OF TENDER SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590 001.
4.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PANCHAYAT AND MEMBER, TENEDER SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590 001.
5.
DISTRICT OFFICER AND TENDER INVITING AUTHORITY, BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR., AGA FOR R1-5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 05.03.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:4453 WP No. 100911 of 2025
for the petitioners, the petition was ordered to be listed on
10.03.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37