Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4367 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1374/2025 · 2025-02-28

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1374 of 2025 ------ 1. Amit Kumar Ram, Aged about-18 Years, Son of Bajrani Ram 2. Golu Kumar @ Avinash Kumar, aged about 20 years, son of Bajrangi Ram 3. Bajrangi Ram, aged about 48 years, son of Ram Kishun Ram All are residents of Police Line, (Rajendra Nagar), Giridih, Post Office-Giridih, P.S.-Giridih, Dist.-Giridih .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.05 Dated- 28-02-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Giridh (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.194 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 384, 337, 338, 427, 354, 307 and 379/34 of the I.P.C, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons demanding extortion of Rs.5,000/- per day for running the restaurant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further submitted that for the self-same occurrence from the side of the petitioners Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.195 of 2024 has been instituted. It is then submitted that there was free fight between the parties. It is further submitted that petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and will not go to near the place of occurrence. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, giridih in connection with Giridih (Mufassil) P.S. Case No.194 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and will not go to near the place of occurrence and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Rohit/