Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43669 (RAJ)

KIRAN KATEWA D/O SHRI JAISINGH KATEWA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6795/2023 · 2025-11-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48338] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6795/2023 Kiran Katewa D/o Shri Jaisingh Katewa, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Bakhtawarpura, Tehsil Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, School Education And Bhasa, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ghoonghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: The respondents may kindly be directed to extend the benefit of service hence, the action of the respondents to deprive the petitioner from benefit of service including seniority, continuity notional fixation, service, of service pay benefits, selection scale and grant of annual grade increment to the petitioner from the date the incumbents/candidates lower in merit were given benefit with all consequential benefits. [2025:RJ-JP:48338] (2 of 2) [CW-6795/2023] 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 30.10.2017 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19179/2017 titled as Krishan Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and order dated 02.05.2019 in SB CWP No.5951/2019 titled as Satveer Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. passed by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Devansh Sharma, AGC accepts notice. 4. In view of aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of in terms of order passed in case of Krishan Lal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. and Satveer Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), if the ratio is applicable on the facts of the case. 5. It is hereby clarified that we have not verified veracity of facts but in case, there is veracity of facts as mentioned by petitioner, the respondents are at liberty to take appropriate decision within a period of 90 days from receipt of copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, writ petition along with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /225