Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43668 (AP)

APSRTC v. PADALA SUBBA REDDY AND ANOTHER

MACMA/211/2025 · 2025-04-06

V Srinivas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ef (|■W' o PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS I motor ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 211 OF 2025 Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, praying that the High Court may be pleased to allow the MACMA by setting aside the Order and Decree, dated 29-09-2014 passed in M.V.O.P No.1170 of 2012 by the Court of the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) at Guntur, Guntur District. Between: Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, Hyderabad City Civil Court Limits (Owner of RTC Bus No.AP 29 Z 0538) its ...Appellant/Respondent AND 1. Padala Subba Reddy, S/o.Late Sambasiva Reddy, Hindu 51 years, R/e.G^*^ Lane, Thirumala Towers, Guntur, Guntur District. 2. Padala Jayalaxmi, W/o.Subba Reddy, Hindu R/o.6^^ Lane, Thirumala Towers, Guntur, Guntur District. aged about aged about 47 years ...Respondents/Claimants Counsel for the Appellant :Srl Y:Abdul Hafeez, representing Sri S.Venkateswarlu, SC for APSRTC Counsel lor the Respondent No.1 Counsel for the Respondent No.2:Sri G.L.Nageswar Rao The Court made the following: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS M.A.C.M.A.No.211 of 2025 JUDGMENT: This M.A.C.M.A is filed by the Appellant/Respondent against the order dated 29.09.2014 in M.V.O.P.No.1170 of 2012 passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge) Guntur, wherein the learned Judge has allowed the M.V.O.P with proportionate costs and the petitioners are awarded Rs.23,57,623/- as compensation with interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of the petition till the date of realization from the Respondent-APSRTC. 2. Heard Sri Y.Abdul Hafeez, learned counsel representing Sri S.^ Venkateswarlu, learned Standing Counsel for the Appellant/APSRTC and Sri G.L.Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2/claimants. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Y.Abdul 3. Hafeez, learned counsel representing Sri S. Venkateswarlu, learned Standing Counsel for the Appellant/APSRTC appeared and submits that the matter is settled out of the Court and hence the Appellant/Respondent intends to withdraw this case and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal. 4. Permission is accorded. 2 i Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Interim Orders, granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stands closed. SD/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal (District 1. The Chairman Judge) at Guntur, Guntur District. (With records) One CC to Sri S.Venkateswarlu (SC for APSRTC), Advocate [OPUC] 2. 3. One CC to Sri G.L.Nageswar Rao, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati 5. Two CD Copies 4. BSV HIGH COURT DATED:07/04/2025 JUDGMENT MACMA.No.211 of 2025 DISMISSING THE MAGMA AS WITHDRAWN