CWP-9985-2025 (O&M) 135 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Hawa Singh Thakran State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Ms. Saanvi Singla, SUDHIR SINGH Present nature of Mandamus petitioner under the Oustees the petitioner, keeping in view the list (Annexure P the respondents to decide application dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P petitioner within 2. At the petitioner would be satisfied, in case, dated 04.03.2025 is adverted to by the respondents till date. 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Hawa Singh Thakran versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Ms. Saanvi Singla, Advocate for the ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition herein, inter alia andamus directing the respondents to allot petitioner under the Oustees quota in pursuance to acquisition of the land the petitioner, keeping in view the list (Annexure P the respondents to decide application dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P petitioner within a time bound manner. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, his pending 2025 is decided by respondent No. by the respondents till date. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9985-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 07, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR , Advocate for for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional AG Haryana and the respondents. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ in the respondents to allot the plot to the in pursuance to acquisition of the land of the petitioner, keeping in view the list (Annexure P-5), and further to direct the respondents to decide application dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the earned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending representation/application respondent No.4, which have not been 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s in the plot to the of to direct 6) of the earned counsel for the petitioner submits that /application not been MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-9985-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.4 and it shall take decision either way, on pending representation/application dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider pending representation/application dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment