MOHAMMAD ARIF S/O KAYAMUDEEN v. MAQBOOL URF DHOLU, S/O. IBRAHIM
CW/17283/2025 · 2025-11-13
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43657 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43657 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45678] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17283/2025 Mohammad Arif S/o Kayamudeen, Aged About 34 Years, R/o. Adarsh Colony Ward No. 1 Gudha Gorji, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). Through Power Of Attorney Holder - Naseem Bano W/o. Mohammad Arif, Aged About 30 Years, R/o. Adarsh Colony Ward No. 1 Gudha Gorji, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Maqbool Urf Dholu, Aged About 72 Years, S/o. Ibrahim, R/o. Jakhal, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
2. Surendra Singh, Aged About 34 Years, S/o. Manbhool Singh, R/o. Mahala Ki Dhani, Than Teetanwar, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
3. Vijendra Singh, Aged About 30 Years, S/o. Manbhool Singh, R/o. Mahala Ki Dhani. Than Teetanwar, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
4. Khayaliram S/o Ghasi Ram, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Burli, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan).
5. Smt. Sunita Devi W/o Surendra Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o. Mahala Ki Dhani, Than Teetanwar, Tehsil Udaipurwati, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. S. Hasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Fahad Hasan, Mr. Aquit Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 13/11/2025
1. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and submits that the petitioner is willing to pay the
[2025:RJ-JP:45678] (2 of 2) [CW-17283/2025] requisite stamp duty payable on the agreement to sale dated
11.08.2003. It is further submitted that the liberty be granted to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before the learned Court below for payment of the deficient stamp duty on the said agreement.
2. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application for payment of the necessary stamp duty.
3. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner files such an application for payment of stamp duty on the document, the same shall be considered and decided by the concerned Court on its own merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by this order.
4. The stay application as well as other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/17