DHARMVEER @ MAHODAV S/O SHRIRAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13118/2025 · 2025-10-31
Sameer Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43653 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43653 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43710] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13118/2025
1. Dharmveer @ Mahodav S/o Shriram Gurjar, R/o Gurjarpura, Bhabru, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror)
2. Lakhan @ Manoj S/o Mevaram Gurjar, R/o Gurjarpura, Bhabru, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Kotputli, District Kotputli Behror) ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 31/10/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No.205/2025 registered at Police Station Virat Nagar District Kotputli Behror for the offence(s) under Sections 8, 21 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the applicants are the sole bread earners of their families. It is submitted that they have no criminal antecedents registered against them. It is also submitted that the recovered quantity is much less than the commercial quantity. It is submitted that the applicants have been behind bars since 21.09.2025 and that the trial will take a long time. It is further submitted that the
[2025:RJ-JP:43710] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13118/2025] applicants are ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by the Court.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Heard and considered.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, the fact that the applicants are sole bread earners of their family; that they are not having any criminal antecedents; looking to the custody period and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge them on bail subject to condition that accused-applicants shall contribute to the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months from the date of enlarging on bail, for two hours, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO concerned.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicants- Dharmveer @ Mahodav S/o Shriram Gurjar and Lakhan @ Manoj S/o Mevaram Gurjar shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /151