Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43652 (PNJ)

RANJIT SINGH v. DARSHAN SINGH

RSA/4698/2001 · 2025-07-17

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 210 Ranjit Singh Darshan CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) judgment and decree dated Judge, Bathinda whereby the first appeal filed by the respondent Darshan Singh (appellant before the first Appellate Court) has been allowed. the present entered into Compromise dated 09.7.2025, as per which the appellant had undertaken to withdraw the present appeal. over in the Court, which is tak appellant as learned counsel representing the appellant had stated that RSA-4698-2001 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.4698 of 2001 Date of decision :-17.07.2025 Ranjit Singh Versus Darshan Singh CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the appellant. Mr. Munish Singal, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellant is in present second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 11.9.2001 passed by the learned District Judge, Bathinda whereby the first appeal filed by the respondent Darshan Singh (appellant before the first Appellate Court) has been It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent that the present appeal has been rendered infructuous as the parties have entered into Compromise dated 09.7.2025, as per which the appellant had undertaken to withdraw the present appeal. Copy of the said Compromise dated 09.7.2025 handed over in the Court, which is taken on record. On the last date of hearing, notice was issued to the appellant as learned counsel representing the appellant had stated that 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No.4698 of 2001 (O & M) .2025 …..Appellant …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Munish Singal, Advocate for the respondent. The appellant is in present second appeal against the 11.9.2001 passed by the learned District Judge, Bathinda whereby the first appeal filed by the respondent- Darshan Singh (appellant before the first Appellate Court) has been It is submitted by learned counsel for the respondent that appeal has been rendered infructuous as the parties have entered into Compromise dated 09.7.2025, as per which the appellant had undertaken to withdraw the present appeal. Copy of the said Compromise dated 09.7.2025 handed en on record. On the last date of hearing, notice was issued to the appellant as learned counsel representing the appellant had stated that VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.21 18.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document he had no fresh instructions in the matter and prayed for issuance of fresh notice to the appellant. been received back duly served, however, the appellant. counsel for the respondent, the present appeal is infructuous granted to the appellant period of 0 July 17, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No RSA-4698-2001 (O & M) he had no fresh instructions in the matter and prayed for issuance of fresh notice to the appellant. As per office report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back duly served, however, the appellant. As such, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present appeal is infructuous. However, in case anything survives, granted to the appellant to move an appropriate application within a period of 01 month from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 he had no fresh instructions in the matter and prayed for issuance of ce report, notice issued to the appellant has been received back duly served, however, none appears on behalf of As such, in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, the present appeal is disposed of as . However, in case anything survives, liberty is being to move an appropriate application within a month from today for reviving the same, if so, advised. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.21 18.22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document