IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.657 of 2025 ------ 1. Hazari Mishra, aged about 40 years, son of Gopal Ji Mishra, resident of Kh. No. 919-920, Gound Floor, Khrak Riwara, VTC Satberi, P.O. & P.S.- Satberi, District- South Delhi. 2. Gopal Ji Mishra, aged about 65 years, son of Dhanush Dhari Mishra, resident of Flat No.- 306, Ridhi Sidhi Apartment, Opposite B.I.T. Mesra, Vastu Vihar, Kedal, P.O. & P.S.- Mesra, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shesham Mishra, w/o Hazari Mishra, resident of Main Road, Religarha, P.O. & P.S.- Giddi, District- Hazaribag, Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate Ms. Nirupama, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-29-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Giddi P.S. Case No.59 of 2024 instituted under Sections 85/75(2)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 being the husband and the petitioner No.2 being the father-in-law, treated the informant with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is all false and general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that because of marital discord, this false case has been foisted against the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioner No.1 undertakes that he will keep and maintain the informant with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife if and when she resumes conjugal life with him. It is lastly submitted that petitioners undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from the date of the order and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.25,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Hazaribag in connection with Giddi P.S. Case No.59 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and the petitioner No.1 will keep and maintain the informant with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife if and when she resumes conjugal life with him and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/