Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:35943
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9423 of 2023 1 - Dadarao Gajbhiye S/o Lt. Darayji Gajbhiye Aged About 53 Years R/o Boriya Khurd, Rda Colony, Block O/140 Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education Through The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Under Secretary Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education, Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Finance Officer Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education Pension Bada, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ujjwal Choubey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Akash Kumar Kundu, Advocate. For Respondent(s) No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT
2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 24/07/2025
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-
“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner from the respondents.
order dated 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting aside/quashing the impugned 11.10.2023 (Annexure P/1) and further be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to continue at Forest Range Khadgawan, Forest Division, Korea, District- Korea (C.G.). 10.3 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including cost of the petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous.
3
3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the
submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Raghu Jat