Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43606 (BOM)

VINAYAK AMRUT MEHTAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/5514/2024 · 2025-02-24

Shri S M Modak, Shri Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 34-WP-5514-24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5514 OF 2024 Vinayak Amrut Mehtar .... Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Dnyanesh Patil i/b. Aditya Raktade, Advocate for Petitioner. • Mr. B. V. Holambe-Patil, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATE : 24th FEBRUARY, 2025 P.C. : 1. After arguing for some time, when we expressed our disinclination to grant relief in this Petition, the learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for unconditional withdrawal of this Petition, with liberty to prefer an application for discharge before the Trial Court after the charge-sheet is filed. 2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally. The Petitioner is at liberty to prefer an application for discharge before the Trial Court after the Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2025.02.26 13:19:10 +0530 2 / 2 34-WP-5514-24.odt charge-sheet is filed. If such an application is preferred, it shall be decided on its own merits, in accordance with law, without being influenced by withdrawal of this Petition. 3. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. (S. M. MODAK J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)