CWP-1210- IN THE 205 Sukhdev Singh Nagar Panchayat Machhiwara CORAM: Present : HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of order in the nature of 23.01.2008(Annexure P terminated and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to regularize the services of the petitioner in view of the instructions dated 15.12.2006 as well as the judgment of H Court of India in State of Punjab and another Versus Gurcharan Singh Kahlon and another with all consequential benefits. 2. 1 -2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Sukhdev Singh VERSUS Nagar Panchayat Machhiwara HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Gurnoor Singh Sethi, Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocate for the respondent. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 23.01.2008(Annexure P-13), vide which the services of the petitioner has been terminated and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to regularize the services of the petitioner in view of the instructions dated 15.12.2006 as well as the judgment of H Court of India in Civil Appeal No.1269 of 2000, dated 26.04.2007 State of Punjab and another Versus Gurcharan Singh Kahlon and another with all consequential benefits. On 17.07.2025, the following order was passed: “The matter has been listed before this Court for HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1210-2008(O&M) Date of Decision: September 15, 2025 .....Petitioner VERSUS ...Respondent HARPREET SINGH BRAR , Advocate for the petitioner. , Advocate for the respondent. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ or certiorari for quashing the order dated the services of the petitioner has been terminated and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to regularize the services of the petitioner in view of the instructions dated 15.12.2006 as well as the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Civil Appeal No.1269 of 2000, dated 26.04.2007 titled as State of Punjab and another Versus Gurcharan Singh Kahlon and another On 17.07.2025, the following order was passed:- “The matter has been listed before this Court for , 2025 .....Petitioner ...Respondent of or certiorari for quashing the order dated the services of the petitioner has been terminated and further for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to regularize the services of the petitioner in view of on’ble Supreme titled as State of Punjab and another Versus Gurcharan Singh Kahlon and another, “The matter has been listed before this Court for PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.09.17 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1210- referring the same to Mediation under the Special Mediation Drive Mediation “For the Nation”. amongst the parties. The parties are directed to appe Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court (Mobile No.98888 81287, email ID concerned a 3. between the parties on 02.09.2025 on the following terms and conditions: “ 8. parties hereto: 2 -2008 referring the same to Mediation under the Special Mediation Drive Mediation “For the Nation”. There could be some likelihood of an amicable settlement amongst the parties. The parties are directed to appe Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court (Mobile No.98888 81287, email ID- supdt.mcc-phc@aij.gov.in Registry is directed to inform the parties and the counsel concerned about the date fixed for mediation.” Pursuant thereto, the agreement/settlement was executed between the parties on 02.09.2025 on the following terms and conditions: The following settlement has been arrived at between the parties hereto: i) Both the parties have mutually agreed that the entire dispute can be resolved as the services of first party has been regularized by the second party and the first party is working with the second party since 1995. ii) That the authorized signatory of the informed that the services of first party has been regularized and the first party is working with the second party since 1995. iii) That both the parties have agreed that as per regularization order dated 01.06.2020, services of the first party has been regularized w.e.f. 01.04.2001, thus, the impugned order dated 23.01.2008 is nullified and further the second prayer of the first party in the writ petition with regard to regularization has been allowed. iv) That both the parties have agree by the first party in the writ petition has already been granted by the second party. Both the parties will concede the said factum before the Hon’ble High Court. file any Court case of this nature against the second party as referring the same to Mediation under the Special Mediation Drive There could be some likelihood of an amicable settlement amongst the parties. The parties are directed to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court (Mobile No.98888 phc@aij.gov.in) on 23.07.2025. Registry is directed to inform the parties and the counsel bout the date fixed for mediation.” Pursuant thereto, the agreement/settlement was executed between the parties on 02.09.2025 on the following terms and conditions:- The following settlement has been arrived at between the Both the parties have mutually agreed that the entire dispute can be resolved as the services of first party has been regularized by the second party and the first party is working with the second party since 1995. That the authorized signatory of the second party has informed that the services of first party has been regularized and the first party is working with the second party since 1995. That both the parties have agreed that as per regularization order dated 01.06.2020, services of the first party has been regularized w.e.f. 01.04.2001, thus, the impugned order dated 23.01.2008 is nullified and further the second prayer of the first party in the writ petition with regard to regularization has been allowed. That both the parties have agreed that the relief sought by the first party in the writ petition has already been granted by the second party. Both the parties will concede the said factum before the Hon’ble High Court. The first party shall not file any Court case of this nature against the second party as referring the same to Mediation under the Special Mediation Drive- There could be some likelihood of an amicable settlement ar before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court (Mobile No.98888- Registry is directed to inform the parties and the counsel Pursuant thereto, the agreement/settlement was executed The following settlement has been arrived at between the Both the parties have mutually agreed that the entire dispute can be resolved as the services of first party has been regularized by the second party and the first party is working second party has informed that the services of first party has been regularized and the first party is working with the second party since 1995. That both the parties have agreed that as per regularization order dated 01.06.2020, services of the first party has been regularized w.e.f. 01.04.2001, thus, the impugned order dated 23.01.2008 is nullified and further the second prayer of the first party in the writ petition with regard d that the relief sought by the first party in the writ petition has already been granted by the second party. Both the parties will concede the said The first party shall not file any Court case of this nature against the second party as PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.09.17 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1210- 9. no further claim for any sort of compensation etc. either party in 10. that they have no further claims or demands against each other with respect to different Courts of Law and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of Conciliation/Mediation and shall not institute a case against each other with reference to the present claim. [ 4. affirms the settlement and submits the present petition can be disposed of in view of the above settlement. He further and conditions of settlement and will not raise any claim in future. 5. parties would be bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement. 6. between the parties has been resolved by this Court in this matter 7. also the pending miscellaneo September P.C 3 -2008 the claim settled by way of the present settlement/agreement between both the parties is full and final That the present settlement/agreement will be full and fina no further claim for any sort of compensation etc. either party in any Court of law. By signing this settlement/agreement the parties hereto state that they have no further claims or demands against each other with respect to the suit/claim/proceedings filed by both the parties in the different Courts of Law and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of Conciliation/Mediation and shall not institute a case against each other with reference to the present claim. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner affirms the settlement and submits the present petition can be disposed of in view of the above settlement. He further undertakes to abide by the terms and conditions of settlement and will not raise any claim in future. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the parties would be bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement. A perusal of the settlement/agreement indicates that dispute between the parties has been resolved and no further interference is required by this Court in this matter. In view of the above the present writ petition is also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, September 15, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned. : Whether Reportable. : the claim settled by way of the present settlement/agreement between both the parties is full and final. That the present settlement/agreement will be full and final and no further claim for any sort of compensation etc. shall be claimed by By signing this settlement/agreement the parties hereto state that they have no further claims or demands against each other with the suit/claim/proceedings filed by both the parties in the different Courts of Law and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the process of Conciliation/Mediation and shall not institute any other case against each other with reference to the present claim.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner affirms the settlement and submits the present petition can be disposed of in undertakes to abide by the terms and conditions of settlement and will not raise any claim in future. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the parties would be bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement. the settlement/agreement indicates that dispute and no further interference is required the present writ petition is disposed of, so us application(s), if any, (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Yes/No the claim settled by way of the present settlement/agreement l and hall be claimed by By signing this settlement/agreement the parties hereto state that they have no further claims or demands against each other with the suit/claim/proceedings filed by both the parties in the different Courts of Law and all the disputes and differences in this regard have been amicably settled by the parties hereto through the ny other Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner affirms the settlement and submits the present petition can be disposed of in undertakes to abide by the terms Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the the settlement/agreement indicates that dispute and no further interference is required , so (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.09.17 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document