1 2025:CGHC:1313 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1769 of 2016 1. Raghuveer Singh S/o Shri Anuj Singh Bargah, Aged About 40 Years Occupation- Driver Of Tractor No. C.G.10 D.7129 And Trolly No. C.G.10 D.7061, R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 2. Ramsharan Singh S/o Shri Anujram Singh, Aged About 45 Years Occupation- Owner Of Tractor No. C.G.10 D.7129 And Trolly No. C.G.10 D.7061, R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh (Non-Applicants). ... Appellants versus 1. Chitrekha Bai Wd/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 2. Ku. Bhagwati Sahu D/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, Aged About 17 Years Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Chitrekha Sahu, Wd/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 3. Horilal Sahu S/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, Aged About 15 Years Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Chitrekha Sahu, Wd/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 4. Ku. Payal D/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, Aged About 13 Years Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Chitrekha Sahu, Wd/o Late Shri SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2025.01.09 14:19:16 +0530 2 Veerulal Sahu, R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 5. Ku. Amita D/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, Aged About 11 Years Minor Represented Through Natural Guardian Chitrekha Sahu, Wd/o Late Shri Veerulal Sahu, R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 6. Dhaneshwari Sahu Wd/o Late Shri Kejuram Sahu, Aged About 62 Years R/o Village- Dhardei, Thana And Tahsil- Pathariya, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. 7. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Opposite Rajeev Plaza, Divisional Office- Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellant : None. For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Rakesh Manikpuri, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 08/01/2025 1. Today none appears on behalf of the appellants even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round, it appears that the appellants are not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.