Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43599 (CHH)

RAM PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10972/2025 · 2025-09-22

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:48676 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10972 of 2025 1 - Ram Pratap Singh S/o Late Narayan Singh Aged About 51 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Manoharpur, Block Sarangarh, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 2 - Mahendra Kumar Yadav S/o Late Jagdev Yadav Aged About 50 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Kisanpara, Block Shankargarh, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Education Division Surguja, District Surguja Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 5 - District Education Officer Balrampur-Ramanujganj, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh 6 - Block Education Officer Shankargarh District Balrampur-Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Prachi Diwan, Advocate For State : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.09.24 10:51:36 +0530 2 23.09.2025 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition to quash the order dated 18.08.2025 passed by respondent No. 6 by which the petitioners have been relieved from duty ex-parte and also to direct the respondents to allow the petitioners to work on their respective place of posting. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have already preferred an appeal before the concerned authorities. He would further submit that this petition may kindly be disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to pursue appeal. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioners. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika