Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43592 (PNJ)

NAVKIRAN KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

CWP/11207/2019 · 2025-05-06

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 108 Navkiran Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CM-1627-CWP CWP-11207 1. case is taken on Board today itself. 2. petition, services of the petitioner were regularized and thus, is entitled to the consequential benefits arising thereto, regarding which the petitioner shall submit a representation which time bound 3. the same be decided within a further period of in accordance with law. 06.05.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-1627 CWP Date of decision Navkiran Kaur Versus f Punjab and another CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Viren Sibal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Shruti, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CWP-2025 Allowed as prayed for. 11207-2019 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the main case is taken on Board today itself. Learned counsel submits that duri petition, services of the petitioner were regularized and thus, is entitled to the consequential benefits arising thereto, regarding which the petitioner shall submit a representation which may be directed to be decided in a manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. Disposed of. In case a representation is the same be decided within a further period of in accordance with law. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1627-CWP-2025 in CWP-11207-2019 (O & M) Date of decision: 06.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, for the petitioner. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the main Learned counsel submits that during pendency of the present petition, services of the petitioner were regularized and thus, is entitled to the consequential benefits arising thereto, regarding which the petitioner may be directed to be decided in a manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. case a representation is filed within 4 weeks, the same be decided within a further period of 4 months from its receipt, (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.06 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.