1 2025:CGHC:47913 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10968 of 2025 1. Shamdu Ram S/o Naru Aged About 68 Years R/o 01 Manjhipara Vill, Post, Tah. And District Bastar C.G. 2. Soman Patel S/o Meghnath Patel Aged About 64 Years R/o 119 Ward No. 08 Vill And Post Kolchur Distt. Bastar C.G. 3. Ratan S/o Lebo Ram Aged About 63 Years R/o 01 Pujaripara Salemeta, Distt. Bastar C.G. 4. Mahadev Mourya S/o Jhagdu Ram Mourya Aged About 63 Years R/o Jhartarai P O Lamker Distt. Bastar C.G. 5. Samaluram Yadav S/o Jagannath Aged About 63 Years R/o 01 Manjhipara Vill, Post, Tah And Distt. Bastar C.G. 6. Ramadhar Mourya S/o Baisakhu Mourya Aged About 64 Years R/o Vill And Post Chapka Tah Bhanpuri Distt. Bastar C.G. (Name And Add. As Per Aadhar) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur C.G. 2. The Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, District Raipur C.G. 3. The Chief Engineer (Administration) Public Works Department, District Raipur C.G. 4. The Chief Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) North Bastar Division No. 02 Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. 5. The Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) North Bastar Division No. 02 Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. 6. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) North Bastar Division No. 02 Jagdalpur, District Bastar C.G. 2 7. Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension Bastar Division Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash A. Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent(s) /State. : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 17/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narensdra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.09.19 12:33:37 +0530