1 2025:CGHC:47915 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10942 of 2025 1. Chumman Ram Baghel S/o Trilochan Baghel Aged About 65 Years R/o House No. 97 Vill And Post Maripara Se Tirth Para Tak Tah Bhanpuri Chhapka Distt. Bastar C.G. 2. Miri Baghel S/o Bongu Baghel Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. 10 Punjiguda Vill Bhond Po. Lamker Distt. Bastar C.G. 3. Hari Singh Thakur S/o Motilal Aged About 64 Years R/o 40 Bairagi Para Vill. And Post Chapka Tah Bhanpuri Distt. Bastar C.G. 4. Panchamu Ram Yadav S/o Maniram Yadav Aged About 63 Years R/o Kosradongari Para Retawand Distt. Bastar C.G. 5. Sukru S/o Chaitu Aged About 63 Years R/o 01 Pujaripara Salemeta Distt. Bastar C.G. (Name And Add As Per Aadhar) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur C.G. 2. The Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, District Raipur C.G. 3. The Chief Engineer (Administration) Public Works Department, District Raipur C.G 4. The Chief Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) North Bastar Divison No. 1 Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar C.G. 5. The Superintendent Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) North Bastar Divison No. 1 Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar C.G. 6. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, (Bh/sa) North Bastar Divison No. 1 Jagdalpur, Distt Bastar C.G. 7. Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Account And Pension Bastar Division Jagdalpur Distt. Bastar C.G. ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash A. Shrivastava. Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State. : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice, Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 17/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narensdra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.09.18 15:57:02 +0530