IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 245 OF 2012 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the Respondents and punish them suitably for deliberate and intentional violation of orders in W.P.No. 15686 of 2005, dated 2-2-2011. Between: Mr.K.L.Sudhakar, S/o. Namcharaiah, Age; 39 years, R/o. D.No.7-150, Kothapeta, Gannavaram, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri K.V.R.K. Prasad, Regional Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Krishna Region, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. Sri Nagendra Prasad, Divisional Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. Sri K.Karunakar, Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Governorpet-ll Depot, Vijayawada. ...Respondents LA. NO: 1 OF 2012(APPL. NO: 207 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to release the increments due to the petitioner on 01-01-2002 and 1-1-2003 by treating the period of suspension from 20-03-2002 to 01-09-2003 as on duty by duly implementing the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.15686 of 2005, Dated 02-02- 2011. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. A. RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: SRI K. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI SANISETTY VENKATESWARLU SC FOR APSRTC The Court made the following Order: APHC010084222012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SEE [3331] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 245/2017 Between: Mr.k.I.sudhakar, ...PETITIONER AND Sri K V R K Prasad and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.A RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K SATYANARAYANA MURTHY 2.SANISETTY VENKATESWARLU SC For APSRTC The Court made the following: :: ORDER:: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the implementation of the order dated 02.02.2011 in W.P.No.15686 of 2005. The petitioner filed W.P.No.15686 of 2011 to declare the proceedings issued by respondent No.2 vide No.PA/18(16)/2005-RM(K), dated 21.02.2005, in so far as imposing the penalty of one increment without cumulative effect besides treating the suspension period from 20.03.2002 to 01.09.2003 on duty, is illegal and arbitrary. non- 2. \ as not '4 The said writ petition was disposed of on 02.02.2011, wherein the operative portion of the said order reads as follows: 3. “....I am of the considered opinion that such an order cannot be interfered by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. However, since the petitioner has already suffered with punishment of stoppage of increment for a period of one year, the order to the effect treating the period of suspension as ‘not on duty’ is liable to be set aside and is accordingly set aside and the respondents are directed to treat the period of suspension as a regular service, however, petitioner is not entitled for any monetary benefits on that ground.” Sri Sanisetty Venkateswarlu, learned Standing Counsel submitted the proceedings vide Case No.O1/876(15686)/2005-GVPT-ll, dated 15.03.2025. In the said proceedings, it was mentioned that, in pursuance of the order passed by the Court, the period of suspension of Sri K.L. Sudhakar, E.358072, Conductor of GVPT-II depot was set aside and reckoned as on duty and arrears payable for the aforementioned period has been arrived and paid an amount of Rs.18,241/- to the petitioner. 4. A perusal of the proceedings, referred to supra, the grievance of the petitioner, regarding the violation order dated 02.02.2011 in W.P.No.15686 of 2005, is misconceived. In fact, the dated 02.02.2011 W.P.No.15686 of 2005 has been complied with. 5. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 6. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATARAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTIONOFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. Sri K.V.R.K. Prasad, Regional Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Krishna Region, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. Sri Nagendra Prasad, Divisional Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. Sri K.Karunakar, Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Governorpet-ll Depot, Vijayawada. 4. One CC to Sri. A. Radhakrishna Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri. K. Satyanarayana Murthy Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri. Sanisetty Venkateswarlu Advocate [OPUC] 7. Three CD Copies Chp HIGH COURT DATED;08/04/2025 ORDER CC.No.245 of 2012 Of ANOW^ 1 ^ , Current Section ^ 10 SEP 2025 X <19, ‘5. CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE