Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43585 (AP)

SMT.GANIVADA RAMANAMMA v. SRI GANIVADA RAJU

FCA/48/2025 · 2025-04-08

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

•v. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR FAMILY COURT APPFAL (FCA) Nos .nH FAMILY COURT APPEAL IFCA) NO: 48 OF 2025 Appeal under section 19 of Family Courts Act, order passed by the Family Court dated.09.07.2009. RAO 52 of 2025 1984 challenging the at Visakhapatnam in O.P.No.465/05, Between; Smt.Ganivada Ramanamma, W/o Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. Raju, Age 44 years, R/o. D.No. 15-60/1, ...Petitioner/Respondent AND Sri Ganivada Raju, S/o. Pydithalli, Age 52 S.E.Section, E.Co.Railway, Visakhapatnam. years. Working as Mechanic, ...Respondents % EAMM^COURTAPPFAI Appeal under section 19 passed by the Family Court dated.09.07.2009 NO: 52 OF 20?.^ of Family Courts Act challenging the order at Visakhapatnam in M.C.No.89/2004, Between: 1- Smt. Ganivada Ramanamma, ' 15-60/1, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 2. Ganivada Shantha Kumari, r Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. 3. Ganivada Srinivasu Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam 4. Ganivada Nagendrababu, ‘ Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam. (Petitioners 2 to 4 W/o. Raju, Age 44 years, R/o. D.No. D/o. Raju, Age 25 years, R/o. D.No. 15-60/1, S/o. Raju, Age 21 years, R/o. D.No. 15-60/1 S/o. Raju, Age 19 years, R/o. D.No. 15-60/1, are not necessary parties) ...Petitioner/Respondent AND Sa Ganivada Raju, S/o. Pydi.halli, Age 52 years. Working as Mechanic, S.E.Section, E.Co.Railway, Visakhapatnam ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to direct the praying that in the circumstances in support of the petition, the High Court may be pay the maintenance to the 1st respondent to petitioner pending disposal of the main F.C.A. Counsel for the Appellants in both the appeals : Sri T. Diwakar Reddy representing Sri G Venkata Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: - The Court made the following Judgment: APHC011490772010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] c‘ a WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NOS: 48 and 52 of 2025 Between; Smt.Ganivada Ramanamma, w/o Raju, Age 44 years, R/o.D.No.15-60/1, Gopalapatnam, Vishakhapatnam and 3 others AND ...APPELLANTS Sri Ganivada Raju, S/o. Pydithalli, Age 52 years. Working as Mechanic, S.E.Section, E.Co.Railway, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 52 of 2025 Smt.Ganivada Ramanamma, w/o Raju, Age 44 years, R/o.D.No. 15-60/1, Gopalapatnam, Vishakhapatnam and 3 others ...APPELLANTS AND Sri Ganivada Raju, S/o. Pydithalli, Age 52 years. Working as Mechanic, S.E.Section, E.Co.Railway, Visakhapatnam ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant; Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following Judgment; (per NJS,J) Mr. T.Diwakar Reddy, learned counsel representing Mr. G.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants states that during the pendency of the appeals, the respondent/husband died. In view of the same, no further adjudication is required. G VENKATA REDDY 2. Recording the same, these Family Court Appeals are dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam district 2. One CC to Sri. G Venkata Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies Stu vna HIGH COURT DATED:09/04/2025 JUDGMENT FCA.Nos.48 & 52 of 2025 DISMISSING THE FAMILY COURT APPEALS