Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43581 (RAJ)

SUMIT KUMAR S/O SHRI JAWALA PRASADH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15377/2025 · 2025-11-20

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47046] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Interim Bail Application No. 15377/2025 Sumit Kumar S/o Shri Jawala Prasadh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jalalpur, Police Station Maniya, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sewar Jail, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through Standing Counsel. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal, Advocate Mr. Yogesh Singhal, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 20/11/2025 Instant bail application has been preferred under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking interim bail to the petitioner, namely Sumit Kumar in a case arising out of F.I.R. No.0354/2023 registered at Police Station Maniya District Dholpur for offences punishable under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 & 120-B of I.P.C. and under Sections 3/25, 5/25 & 5/25 of Arms Act on the ground that the marriage of the petitioner's cousin sister, namely Roobi is scheduled to be solemnized on 22.11.2025. Submissions of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner are that the petitioner's interim bail application was dismissed by the Court of ld. Additional Sessions Judge vide its order dt.14.11.2025. The marriage of the petitioner's cousin sister, namely Roobi is going to be solemnized on 22.11.2025. As indicated in the enclosed marriage card, the wedding ceremonies have already commenced from 18.11.2025 onwards. The petitioner's presence is required at the marriage to fulfill [2025:RJ-JP:47046] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15377/2025] his social responsibilities during the ceremonies. Hence, it is prayed that the petitioner may be granted interim bail for a period of 3-days. Heard. Perused the material made available on record. Having considered the facts & circumstances of the case and considering the submissions made at bar, this Court finds no justifiable grounds to grant interim bail and therefore declines to entertain the application. Consequently, the present interim bail application filed by the petitioner is dismissed. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J ashok/18