Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4358 (GAU)

M/s Limin Enterprises and Anr v. The State of AP and 6 Ors

WP(C)/153/2025 · 2025-04-03

Kalyan Rai Surana

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040005242025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/153/2025 M/s Limin Enterprises and Anr C Sector, Gandhi Market, Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Beli Gadi Age: Occupation : Son of Shri Tabe Gadi proprietor of M/s Limin Enterprises permanent resident of Deke Village PO and PS Tirbin Leparada District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Secretary (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Secretary Planning and Investment Age: 0 Occupation : Civil Secretariat Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Chief Engineer (Central Zone) Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Power Page No.# 2/3 Electrical at Vidyut Bhawan 0 Point Tinali Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 5:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Transmission Monitoring and Planning Zone Department of Power (Electrical) at Vidyut Bhawan 0 Point Tinali Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 6:The Superintendent Engineer (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : Aalo West Siang District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 7:The Executive Engineer (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : Basar Electrical Division Department of Power (Electrical) District Leparada Advocate for the Petitioner : Nikita Danggen, Penjom Siga,Honi Tana Tara,Karmu Chotton,Oken Duggong Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC(Power),Lissing Perme BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 04.04.2025 Both sides are duly represented. Mr. Oken Duggong, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a clerical Page No.# 3/3 mistake has been inadvertently made in this writ petition and therefore, he seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file again. Prayer is allowed. The matter stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant