Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4358 (AP)

Sandhyapogu Vinay, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/2833/2020 · 2025-09-11

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010031382020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2833/2020 Between: 1. SANDHYAPOGU VINAY,, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O- SRINIVASULU, R/O- H.NO.41/473/4, SAIBABA NAGAR, KURNOOL TOWN, SC- MADIGA, CAR DRIVER. 2. GADDA SIVA,, AGED 26 YRS, S/O- MOHAN, R/P- H.NO.41/473-59, SAIBABA NAGAR, KURNOOL TOW, SC-MADIGA, CAR DRIVER. 3. SANDHAPOGU SAVARI,, AGED 28 YRS, S/O- RAMUDU, R/O- H.NO.41-473/66-S, SAIBABA NAGAR, KURNOOL TOWN, SC- MADIGA, TRACTOR DRIVER. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. Y BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2833 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to declare the action of the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 in Summoning the Petitioners to the Police Station and harassing/threatening the Petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 not to harass the petitioners by Summoning them to the Police Station.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 12.09.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2833 of 2020 Dated.12.09.2025 UPS 31