Item- 12. sg 02-04-2025 Ct. 8 In The High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side MAT 1907 of 2024 CAN 1 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2024 CAN 3 of 2024 Prasanta Kumar Mahato Vs. Mrinal Kanti Khawas & Ors. Mr. Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raju Bhattacharyya … for the appellant Mr. Saptangshu Basu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saibal Kr. Acharyya …for the respondent no.1 Mr. Lalit Mohan Mahata Mr. Prasanta Behari Mahata Mr. Amit Bikram Mahata Mr. Aditya Mahata …for the respondent no.7 Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, AGP Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh …for the State 1. We dismiss the application for leave to prefer an appeal on the similar reasoning for which we have dismissed CAN 1 of 2024 in MAT 1906 of 2024. Moreover, in this regard, we may refer to paragraph 15 of the judgment in WP 30376(W) of 2014 only for the purpose that the writ petitioner was not a candidate for the post in which the impugned order was passed by the learned Single Judge. 2. The appeal and the connected applications are, accordingly, dismissed. 3. Affidavit in reply filed in Court is taken on record. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Smita Das De, J.) 2