Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4357 (GAU)

Nonggan Rukbo v. Makyar Jamoh

IA(C)/79/2025 · 2025-03-31

Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040004232025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/79/2025 Nonggan Rukbo Son of Late Akek Rukbo, Mirku Village, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Makyar Jamoh Son of Late Oyem Jamoh, Tigra Mobuk Village, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : D. Mazumdar, C. Gogoi, Tabit Tapak, Advocate for the Respondent : Dicky Panging, D. Tamuk BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 01-04-2025 Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the applicant/respondent and Ms. D. Tamuk, learned counsel for the opposite party/appellant. 2. The limited prayer in this application under Order XXXIX, Rule (1) & (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is for maintaining status quo over the disputed land. Page No.# 2/2 3. It is the case of the applicant that during the pendency of the case before this Court, the opposite party has abused the stay order dated 12.06.2024 by illegally encroaching upon his land and attempting to change the structure and nature of the disputed land. It is stated that some grown up trees which were planted by the applicant has been cut down, some of which were more than 43 (Forty-Three) years old. The opposite party has therefore, violated the stay order dated 12.06.2024 in the said manner by attempting to change the structure and nature of the disputed land. It is, therefore, prayed that a direction may be given for maintaining status quo over the disputed land till the disposal of the connected Civil Revision Petition No. 09(AP)2024. 4. The learned counsel for the opposite party/appellant has no objection to the said prayer. 5. Accordingly, the parties are directed to maintain status quo over the disputed land, till next date of listing of the Civil Revision Petition No. 09(AP)2024, i.e. on 30.04.2025. 6. With the above direction, the interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant