[2025:RJ-JP:45960] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16958/2025 Sardar Singh Son Of Ladu Ram, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 5, Derawalidhani, Srimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Sikar, (Rajasthan) 4. The Block Elementary Education Officer, Block Khandela, District Sikar. 5. The Block Elementary Education Officer, Block Srimadhopur, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar Dhenwal Mr. Pushpendra Dutt Rundla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/11/2025 1. Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC accept notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC in the cause list as counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of petition to him. [2025:RJ-JP:45960] (2 of 3) [CW-16958/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment dated 07.09.2020 in case of Chhagan Lal and Ors. Vs. The Director, Elementary Education, and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8371/2020 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur on basis of judgment dated 12.02.2015 in case of Suman Jhanwar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5405/2012 submits that this writ petition may also be decided in light of the judgment as referred by him. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in case the writ petition is decided in light of the aforementioned judgments. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Chhagan Lal & Ors. Vs. The Director, Elementary Education, & Ors. (supra) and Suman Jhanwar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner(s) is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. [2025:RJ-JP:45960] (3 of 3) [CW-16958/2025] 7. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/393