IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCFI I.ANEOUS APPEAI Nn«- CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No: Mi nf 7nng Appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 aggrieved by the Decree and Order. Dt.26.04.2005 in O.P No.18 of 2000 on the file of court of Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram. Between: 614 & 647 Of 2nnfi Chekuri Ramakrisham Raju. S/o Brahmajiraju. Business, R/o Plot No.102, Swarnajayanthi Towers, Balayya Sastri Layout, Seetahammadhara, Visakhapatnam. age 35 years, Occ; -.Appellant/Petitioner AND Chekuri Ramavathi, W/o Ramakrishnam Raju, age 30 years being unsound mind person represented by her brother and guardian Sri Satyanarayana Raju, R/o Chilukur District. Undi Mandal, West Godavari ■-Respondent/Petltioner Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Counsel for the Respondent: Sri P Durga Prasad CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No: 647 of ?nnR • i ^Appeal filed under Section .28 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, aggrieved by the Decree and Order, Dt.26.04.2005 in O.P No.53 of 1999 on the file of court of Senior Civil Judge, Bhimavaram. Between: Chekuri Ramakrisham Raju, S/o Brahmajiraju, age 42 years, Occ; Business, R/o Plot No. 102, Swarnajayanthi Towers, Balayya Sastri Layout, Seetahammadhara, Visakhapatnam. ...Appellant/Respondent AND Chekuri Ramavathi, W/o Ramakrishnam Raju, C/o. Satyanarayana Raju, age 37 years, R/o Chilukur, Undi Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Respondent/Petitioner Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Counsel for the Respondent: Sri P Durga Prasad The Court made the following: 1 (RNT,J & CGR,J C.M.A. NOS.614 & 647 OF 2006) HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARl THE AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN miscellaneous appeal NOS: 614 AND 647 OF 2006 THE CIVIL roMMON JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) petition of the appellant/husband seeking divorce was dismissed and the petition filed by the respondent/wife for restitution decreed. Challenging those orders, these The of conjugal rights was appeals have been filed. 06.01.2025, the following order was passed; 2. On request of learned counsel for the appellant for obtaining latest instructions, post in the next weekly cause-list.” ‘At i! 3. On 21.01.2025, the following order was passed; request of Sri P.Rishyendra Sai, the learned ‘At learned counsel representing counsel for the appellant, list in the next weekly cause list, as last opportunity. 4. Today, there is no representation for the appellant. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 6. The matters pertain to the year 2006. 1 2 (RNTJ & CGR,i ' C.M.A. NOS.614 & 647 OF 2006) 7. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. SD/- E. KAWIESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR llv^ SECTION OFFICER //true copy// To, , West Godavari District. 1. The Civil Judge (Senior Division); Bhimavaram Advocate [OPUC] Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Prasad Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to 3. One CC to Sri P Durga Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at 4. The Section Amaravathi. 5. Three CD Copies SAM HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT CMA.Nos.614 & 647of 2006 DISMISSING THESE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEALS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION