KUCHIPUDI VENKATA BHASKARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/1674/2025 · 2025-01-24
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4356 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4356 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010031632025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328]
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1674/2025 Between:
1. KUCHIPUDI VENKATA BHASKARA RAO, S/O. KRISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION BUSINESS R/O. H.NO 1-5/2, RAYANNAPALEM VILLAGE PEDAVEGI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. THE COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPT., EXCISE COMPLEX, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. 5. THE NODAL PROHIBITION AND EXCISE SUPERINTENDENT, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
2
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Ch.BR. P. Sekhar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri P. Nagaraju, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise. 2. Sri P. Nagaraju, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition & Excise has submitted the Written Instruction furnished by the District Prohibition and Excise Officer, Eluru dated 23.01.2025. Copy of it is served on the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner as well and the same is taken on record. The relevant portion of the said Written Instruction is usefully extracted hereunder:
“It is respectfully submitted that in order to settle the refund claim of the petitioner, this office has issued Proceedings order in Rc.No.84/2022/Refund AF-2019/A1-5, dated 22/06/2022. Immediately after issue of Refund Proceedings, this Office has prepared Refund bill for Rs.10,00,000-00 (Rupees ten lakhs only) pertaining to the individual and the refund bill was submitted to the District Treasury on 16-07-2022. The bill was approved on 19-07-2022 by the District Treasury and the refund amount of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rs.Ten Lakhs) was credited to the petitioner's bank account bearing NO. 0660101017858 on 12.11.2024 with payment reference of the CFMS is RBI3172431421709 for the individual CFMS No.1008928163.”
3. The above extract would indicate that the due amount was credited to the Bank Account of the Writ Petitioner. This Court had directed the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner to obtain instructions from his client whether he has received the said amount into his account or not. 4.
When the matter is now called out, Sri Ch.BR. P. Sekhar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instruction, submits that the Writ Petitioner has received the amount into his Bank Account. 5. Having recorded the same, no further consideration is required in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 3
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J
Dt: 24.01.2025 Vns