SATYAWAN v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD AND OTHERS
CWP/9933/2025 · 2025-04-07
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43557 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43557 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-9933-2025
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9933-2025 Date of Decision: 07.04.2025 Satyawan
......Petitioner(s) Versus
Managing Director, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others
....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents.
**** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to count his daily wage service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2.
The petitioner claims that respondent has not counted his daily wage service for the purpose of pensionary benefits. He joined respondent in 1982 and was regularized in 1993. The period of service from 1982-93 needs to be counted for pensionary benefits. Shivani Gupta 2025.04.07 17:40
CWP-9933-2025
2
3.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Advocate, who on advance notice is present in Court, submits that as per her instructions, competent authority would consider claim of petitioner in the light of similarly situated persons, if any.
4.
Mr. Sandeep Thakan agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.
5.
In the wake of statement of both sides, instant petition stands
disposed of. Let the needful be done within 6 months from today.
07.04.2025
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) shivani
JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking
Yes Whether reportable
No
Shivani Gupta 2025.04.07 17:40