Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43556 (PNJ)

VISHAL @ VISHAL SIHAG v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/18972/2025 · 2025-04-07

Manjari Nehru Kaul

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

104. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Vishal @ Vishal Sihag State of Haryana CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL 1. BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case No.196, dated 12.08.2024, under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(3), 61 of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, register Kalan, District Fatehabad. 2. order was passed IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Vishal @ Vishal Sihag Versus Haryana HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Harmandeep Singh Saini, Advocate, and Mr. Dushant Jog, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Rahul Mohan, Senior DAG, Haryana ----- MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) This is second petition that has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case No.196, dated 12.08.2024, under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(3), 61 of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, register Kalan, District Fatehabad. On the earlier petition i.e. CRM order was passed on 07.01.2025: “After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petit was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal of the instant petition. Dismissed as withdrawn.” IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18972-2025 Date of decision: 07.04.2025 .... Petitioner .... Respondent HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Harmandeep Singh Saini, Advocate, and Mr. Dushant Jog, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Mohan, Senior DAG, Haryana. This is second petition that has been filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023, for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.196, dated 12.08.2024, under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(3), 61 of BNS, 2023, and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Bhattu On the earlier petition i.e. CRM-M-33-2025, the following After arguing for some time, when this Court was not to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal .” This is second petition that has been filed under Section 482 FIR No.196, dated 12.08.2024, under Sections 103(1), 190, 191(3), 61 of BNS, ed at Police Station Bhattu , the following After arguing for some time, when this Court was not a prayer was made by learned counsel for the petitioner for withdrawal SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.07 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18972-2025 - 2 - 3. Since there is no material change in the circumstances, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is made out. 4. Present petition stands dismissed accordingly. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE April 07, 2025 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SANJEEV KUMAR 2025.04.07 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document