Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43554 (RAJ)

SUJAN SINGH S/O GORILAL @ GAURELAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10630/2025 · 2025-09-04

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:35681] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10630/2025 Sujan Singh S/o Gorilal @ Gaurelal, R/o Prithvipura, Police Station Jawar, Jhalawar (Raj.) (Petitioner Presently Confined In Judicial Custody At District Jail, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripunjay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/09/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Sujan Singh S/o Gorilal @ Gaurelal, in FIR No.53/2025 dated 25.03.2025 registered at P.S. Nahargarh (Baran), District - Baran, whereby the petitioner-accused has charged under Sections 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. The petitioner was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a report is registered against unnamed persons and no suspicion was raised [2025:RJ-JP:35681] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10630/2025] against the petitioner accused. He further submits that only on basis of association with other persons present petitioner was arrayed as an accused. He further submits that investigation is completed and he is not required in the investigation. He also submitted that two more cases were also registered against the petitioner accused but he is on bail and there is no evidence to show that the petitioner accused is working in an organized syndicate. He also submitted that the trial will take time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He has submitted a report received from concerned police station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On basis of a report of theft of tractor and trolley, a report is lodged by complainant Radhey Shyam on 25.03.2025. During investigation, police has found involvement of Lalu @ Mohan, Sujan Singh, Sanjeev @ Bhima, Satnarayan and Bhagwan Singh. Police has already filed a chargesheet against Lalu @ Mohan, Sujan Singh and Sanjeev. The record indicate that 7 criminal cases were registered Lalu @ Mohan and 10 criminal cases against Sanjeev @ Bhima, but two criminal cases were registered against petitioner accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioner-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. [2025:RJ-JP:35681] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10630/2025] The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of petitioner- accused is hereby allowed and the petitioner-accused Sujan Singh S/o Gorilal @ Gaurelal, is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioner-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioner-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/158