[2025:RJ-JP:44041] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19255/2024 Seema Kumari D/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Sheoran Farm House, Via Jakhod, Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Rajasthan Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu. 4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Churu. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 695/2025 Sanju Meena D/o Lala Ram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Amli Ki Dhani, Watika, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2065/2025 Priyanka Upadhyay D/o Ratti Ram Upadhyay, W/o Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o - Jyoti Nagar, Behind Krishan Nagar Housing Board, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus [2025:RJ-JP:44041] (2 of 3) [CW-19255/2024] 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Jhlanadoongi Colony, Ghat Ki Guni, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Additional Director (Administration), Medical And Health Services Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki Mr. Mukesh Choudhary Mr. Ankit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/11/2025 1. These matters are de-tagged from original bunch and are considered together. 2. Learned counsel for respondent(s) submits that these petitioners were found eligible and they were given appointment by the respondent(s) and in pursuant to appointment they have joined their duties. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that at the time of recruitment a merit list is prepared and candidates juniors to these petitioners were given appointment on earlier occasion, so these petitioners are entitled for restoration of their seniority in accordance with merit along with notional benefits. [2025:RJ-JP:44041] (3 of 3) [CW-19255/2024] 4. Learned counsel for respondent undertakes that the respondent(s) will consider the issue of granting notional benefits to these petitioners and placing them in same order of seniority as they were selected in merits. 5. Accordingly, these writ petitions are disposed of with direction to the respondent(s) to consider grant of notional benefits to the petitioners in order of seniority of merit to these petitioners. 6. With aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of with pending application, if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /89,130,154