APHC010604072007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17588/2007 Between: 1. M. CHINNAMMADU @ POLAMMA, R/O JONNALAPADU COLONY, GARA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIRECTOR WOMEN DEVELOP CHILD WELFARE 3 OTHERS, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR ICDS, GARA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM. 4. K GOVINDAMMA W/O P CHINNA RAO, R/O JONNALAPADU COLONY, GARA MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in No. 412/2006 dated 24-07- 2007 of the 2nd respondent by appointing the 4th respondent as Anganwadi Worker of Jonnalapadu Colony & Village, Gara discrimination andviolative of Article 14 & 16 of Constitution of India and set a side the same and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadi Worker, Jonnalapadu Colony & Village, Gara Mandal, Srikakulam District, and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WVMP 3199 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt.24.07.2007 passed in WPMP No. 22532/2007 in WP NO. 17588/2007 and to pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances explained into and in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2007(WPMP 22360 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with the filing of the Certified copy of the Memo No 412/2006 dt 24- 07-2007 of the 2nd respondent, and pass such order or orders. IA NO: 3 OF 2007(WPMP 22532 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in No. 412/2006 dt 24-07- 2007 by Considering the representation made by the petitioner dt 07-08-2007 for appointment to the post of Angawadi Workder, Jonnalapadu Colony & Village, Gara Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the above WP and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE 2. SRINIVASULU KURRA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17588/2007 ORDER: Sri Aravala Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not in contact with him for a long time and he has no instructions in the matter. 2. When the writ petitions are pending before the Court, the parties should invariably be in contact with their advocate, however, in the present case, the petitioner had not been pursuing the case through her advocate, it shows that the petitioner had no interest in pursuing the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, she can file appropriate application within a period of two (02) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 17th October, 2025 RKS