SRI V SEVALA S/O V MOHAN LAL v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/100001/2018 · 2025-02-17
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4355 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4355 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3125 WP No. 100001 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 100001 OF 2018 (GM-TEN)
BETWEEN:
SRI V. SEVALA S/O. V. MOHAN LAL, OCC: CONTRACTOR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O: APPAYYANAHALLI THANDA, APPAYYAMAHALLI, KUDLIGI TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAVEEN TARIKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINOR IRRIGATION, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001.
2.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT OF MINOR IRRIGATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GROUND WATER SECTION, BALLARI, OFFICE OF THE IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, BALLARI – 583 101, BALLARI DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECITION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE NOTIFICATION DATED 21.12.2017 BEARING NOL.KA.NI.HIM/SA NI AND AM.AV/BA/SA EM-2/2017-18/2868 (ONLY IN RESPECT OF ITEM NO.4) ANNEUXRE-A ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION
VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.02.18 11:21:42 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3125 WP No. 100001 of 2018
DECLARING THAT THE PETITIONER IS THE SUCCESSFUL BIDDER IN RESPECT WORK PERTAIN TO CONSTRUCTIONS OF CHECKDAM IN PATINAYAKANAHALLI SITE-2 HOSAPETE TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
The Registry to delete the name of Shri Gangadhar J.M. and print the name of Shri Praveen Tarikar as the counsel appearing for the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition on account of it becoming infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In terms of the memo, the petition stands
disposed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7