J AND K INTEGRATED TEXTILE PARK LTD. TH. RAM AVTAR AGARWAL AND OTHERS v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPTT, AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2158/2024 · 2025-08-11
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4355 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4355 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2158/2024
1. J & K Integrated Textile Park Limited through its Director, Ram Avtar Agarwal S/o Sh. Ram Krishan Agarwal, Age 61 years, R/o Govindsar Industrial Area Hatli Morh, Kathua.
2. Duotech Polypack Pvt. Ltd. through authorized signatory Vikrant Sharma, S/o Sh. Kewal Krishan, R/o Patel Nagar, Kathua, Age 32 years.
3. Duotech Propack Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Harsh Jain, S/o Sh. Nirdosh Jain, R/o Flat No. 2103, Tower CC2, Supertech Capetown Sector 74, Noida Age 38 years.
4. Natural Industries Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Sh. Ram Avtar Agarwal, S/o Sh. Ram Krishan Agarwal R/o Govindsar Industrial Area Hatli Morh, Kathua age 61 years.
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Anishwar Chatterji Koul, Advocate.
Vs
1. Union Territory of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Government, Industries and Commerce Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2. Managing Director, J&K SIDCO, Jawahar Vyapar Bhawan Rail Head Complex, Jammu.
3. Estate Manager, J&K SIDCO, SIDCO Ghatti Industrial Estate, Kathua.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy. AG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 11.08.2025
1. The petitioners, through the medium of the present writ petition, have sought a direction upon the respondents to execute lease deed/tripartite agreement for vacant land Sr. No. 41
2 WP(C) No. 2158/2024
measuring 32 kanals situated in J&K Integrated Textile Part Limited, SIDCO, Kathua in favour of the three-unit members belonging to the petitioners.
2. The petitioners have sought an alternative prayer seeking a direction upon the respondents to decide their representation dated 31.07.2024 wherein the petitioners have sought a similar relief from the respondents.
3. Objections to the writ petition have already been filed by the respondents.
4. Heard and considered.
5. Having regard to the nature of the alternative relief that has been sought by the petitioners by way of the present petition, the same can be disposed of, at this stage, by extending appropriate directions to the respondents to decide the representation dated 31.07.2024 made by the petitioners in accordance with law within a specified time period.
6. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 31.07.2024 made by the petitioners with the respondents seeking execution of the lease deed/tripartite agreement for vacant land measuring 32 kanals in their favour, in accordance with the applicable rules and guidelines most expeditious preferably within a period of one month from the date a copy of this order is made available to the respondents by the petitioners.
3 WP(C) No. 2158/2024
7. The petitioners shall be at liberty to supplement their representation dated 31.07.2024 by moving an additional representation before the respondents.
8.
Disposed of, accordingly.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
11.08.2025
Shivalee
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Shivalee Khajuria 2025.08.12 13:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu