Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43534 (RAJ)

BHURA SINGH S/O SHRI HARI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16520/2025 · 2025-11-19

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46788] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16520/2025 1. Bhura Singh S/o Shri Hari Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Lakhanpur, Bharatpur. 2. Bhawani Shankar S/o Shri Gopal Lal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of P.no. 36, Devli Arab Road, Salasar Dham, Borkheda, Kota. 3. Pushpendra Singh S/o Shri Kishore Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 23, Aastha Nagar, Borkheda, Kota. 4. Hansram S/o Shri Man Singh Gurjar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Mali Mohalla, Bhopur Shahpur, Tehsil Mahwa, Gazipur, Dausa. 5. Dharmendra Kumar Gaur S/o Shri Karan Singh Gaur, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 103, Kautilya Nagar, Deoli Arab Road, Borkhera, Kota. 6. Prabhu Lal Regar S/o Shri Bhoja, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Balta Road, Novedi Kirana Store Ke Pass, Kunhari, Girdharpura, Kota. 7. Ramesh Chand S/o Shri Laxmi Narayan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o H. 1, Gramin Police Line, Kota. 8. Shiv Lal S/o Shri Vishan Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o C-44, Vikas Nagar, Nearby Kaithoon Fore Lane, Dhakadkhedi, Kota. 9. Daulat Ram S/o Shri Ramnarayan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House No. 36-B, Gaytri Vihar-2, Borkhera, Kota. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Kota Range, Kota. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, District Kota Rural. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Swami Mr. Rakesh Swami [2025:RJ-JP:46788] (2 of 3) [CW-16520/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 19/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayer:- (i) By issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, quash and set aside the order dated 16.09.2025 and grant Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- from the date of completion of their 18 years service, with arrears, interest and all consequential benefits. (ii) By issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, quash and set aside the orders dated 18.11.2018, 11.04.2018, 01.04.2016, 01.01.2019, 15.03.2019, 01.08.2022, qua the petitioners or alternatively, the orders may kindly be modified to the extent to grant Grade Pay 4200 to the petitioners on completion of 18 years’ service. (iii) By issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents grant the pay scale of the next promotional post as per the MT Cadre i.e. Sub-Inspector, from the date petitioners became eligible and consequently, grant and release benefits of second selection scale in the Grade Pay of the prescribed promotional post of Sub-Inspector from the date of completion of 18 years of service along with arrears, interest and all consequential benefits. 2. Mr. Parth Sharma on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondent(s). 3. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 20.12.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3873/2019 (Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.) submits that the controversy raised herein is already decided by this Hon’ble Court and the writ petition is disposed of in accordance with order passed in case of Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:46788] (3 of 3) [CW-16520/2025] 4. Learned counsel for respondent has no objection in disposal of writ petition on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra). 5. Having considered aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra) if applicable upon the facts of the case. 6. This order is passed on basis of facts as pleaded in the petition but the respondents are at liberty to verify veracity of facts, before extending ratio in case of Amar Singh (supra). 6. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition along with pending application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /77