Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43528 (PNJ)

KULDIP SINGH ETC. v. PUNJABI UNIVERSITY,PATIALA ETC.

RSA/4495/2001 · 2025-03-04

Sudeepti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 753 KULDIP SINGH ETC. PUNJABI UNIVERSITY,PATIALA ETC. CORAM: Present: SUDEEPTI SHARMA 1. date of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the It seems that the Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present app prosecution. 2. prosecution. 07.11.2024 A.Kaundal In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh RSA-4495 Date of Decision: KULDIP SINGH ETC. VERSUS PUNJABI UNIVERSITY,PATIALA ETC. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA None for the appellants. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Vipul Jindal, Advocate for the respondent **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J (ORAL) No one had put in appearance on behalf of the date of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the It seems that the appellants are no more interested in pursuing the matter. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present app Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether Reportable In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 4495-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.11.2024 .....APPELLANTS PUNJABI UNIVERSITY,PATIALA ETC. ...RESPONDENTS SUDEEPTI SHARMA Pankaj Kumar, Advocate for Advocate for the respondent. No one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellants on the last date of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. no more interested in pursuing the matter. This Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for want of Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No . AMIT KAUNDAL 2024.11.09 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh