` SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 504 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant–Ranjeet Singh S/o Shri Boota Singh, is seeking bail in relation to first information report dated 18.01.2025 bearing FIR No. 0037 of 2025, Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, which was lodged for the offences punishable under Section 109(1), 117(2), 324(4), 351(2), 352, 190 and 191(3) of BNS, 2023. 4. In this FIR, one person, namely, Mangal Singh was named and other one was unknown. During investigation, the statement of the injured was recorded, who disclosed the name of the present applicant. Apart from this, this Court also perused the injury report and as per the Injury Report, injury Nos.1, 2 and 3 are under observation and on supplementary injury report, it is mentioned that due to the injury sustained by the injured, the condition can be worst in prolong time. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the main accused-Mangat Singh alias Mangal Singh has been granted interim bail by the Coordinate Bench in the Anticipatory Bail Application No.140 of 2025 and not only this, other co-accused Harjinder Singh and Kuldeep Singh were also granted interim bail and he submits that since the main accused ` has been granted interim bail in the anticipatory bail application, therefore the applicant be released on bail. 6. On the other side, learned AGA vehemently opposed the bail application by submitting that the injured victim clearly disclosed the name of the present applicant in his statement including the name of the other co-accused and no benefit of the interim bail, granted in anticipatory bail application to the other accused, can be given to this applicant granted in anticipatory bail application, but now in this case, after thorough investigation and after collecting all the credible evidences, including medical report as well as the supplementary medical report, the charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that the manner, in which this crime was committed, there may be possibility that after being released on bail, the applicant can harm the complainant and his family members. 7. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant is not entitled for bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 16.05.2025 R.Bisht `