[2025:RJ-JP:21100] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 421/2025 1. Mr. Gurkripal Singh Bedi Son Of Mr. Harpal Singh Swami, Resident Of Hig - 217, Sas Nagar Mohali, Punjab Director Sarv Awas, Bhiwadi Housing Pvt. Ltd. 2. Mr. Gursharan Batra Son Of Late Mr. Inder Lal Batra, Resident Of House No. 1074 Sector - 4, Panchkula, Haryana Director Sarv Awas, Bhiwadi Housing Pvt. Ltd. 3. Mr. Amit Puri Son Of Ashok Kumar Puri, Resident Of House No. 81 Tribune Society, Rajpur Khurd Chandigarh Director Sarv Awas, Bhiwadi Housing Pvt. Ltd. 4. Sumesh Chawla Son Of Brijlal Chawla, Resident Of 1492, 40B Chandigarh 5. Rajeev Chawla Son Of Shri Omprakash Chawla, Resident Of House No 798 Sector - 9 Panchkula, Haryana ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Dalchand Yadav S/o Ramkanwar Yadav, R/o Village Bichala, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Ms. Savita Nathawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 19/05/2025 The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the proceedings arising out of FIR No. 291/2018 registered with police station Bhiwadi Phase-III District Alwar for the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC on the ground of compromise entered between the complainant respondent No. 2 and the petitioners. It is contended by learned counsel for the [2025:RJ-JP:21100] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-421/2025] petitioners that complainant-respondent No. 2 Dalchand has executed a compromise with the petitioner which bears the signatures of Dalchand on terms and conditions of compromise and the entire amount due to complainant respondent No. 2 has returned. Therefore on the ground of compromise entered between the parties proceedings arising out of aforesaid FIR may be quashed and set aside. Ms. Savita Nathawat, appeared on behalf of respondent No. 2 and concedes that the compromise dated 06.04.2025, bears the signatures of the complainant (respondent No. 2) and if the proceedings against the petitioners may be set aside then the complainant has no objection. Heard and perused the material available on the record. Considering the fact that the parties have agreed upon to enter into compromise and the compromise executed between them bears the signature of the complainant. Therefore, considering the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2022 (14) SCC 531, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present petition. 6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed on the ground of compromise entered between the parties and the FIR No. 291/2018 registered with police station Bhiwadi Phase-III District Alwar with all consequential proceedings airsing out of the said FIR are hereby quashed and set aside. [2025:RJ-JP:21100] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-421/2025] 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /7