IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 44651 OF 2018 Between: Tamarana Kannam Naidu, S/o. Somu Naidu. Hindu, aged about 75 years. Cultivation, R/o. L.B.P. Agraharam (V) Butchiyyapeta (M) Visakhapatnam District. A.P.State. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Prinncipal Secretary (Home) Home Department, Secretariat Buildings. Velagapudi, Krishna District. Andhra Pradesh State. The Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam District. A.P. State. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Butchiyyapeta (V) and (M) Visakhapatnam District. A.P. state. The Station House Officer, Butchiyyapeta, Butchiyyapeta (V) and (M) Visakhapatnam District. A.P. State. Bathula Tatayya Babu, S/o. late Varahala Dora. Hindu, aged about 45 years. Contractor and Ex.M.P.P, Vaddadi. Visakhapatnam District. A.P. The Tahsildar, Butchiyyapeta, Butchiyyapeta (V) and (M) Visakhapatnam District. A.P. State. The Principal (In-charge), Govt. Junior College, Vaddadi (V) Butchiyyapeta (M). Visakhapatnam District. A.P. State. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ...RESPONDENTS f Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution Of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the respondents 3 and 4 respondent is arbitrary, I of India and to pass may deems fit just and nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the in not registering FIR against 5th respondent and 7th i Illegal and bad in law under Article 14 of the Constitution such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court proper in the circumstances. lA NO: 1 OF 2ni« Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances may 4 to register FIR against 5th and enquiry and file final report pending disposal of in support of the writ petition, the High Court be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 7th respondent and conduct the above writ petition. Counsel for the PetitionenSRI K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.6: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5,7: The Court made the following; ORDER ■'■??? APHC010922052018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 44651 OF 2018 Between: Tamarana Kannam Naidu ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Subrahmanyam Counsel for the Respondents: Ld. Govt. Pleader for Home Ld. Govt. Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following order: 1. , The (present writ petition is filed challenging in action on the part of respondents 3 and 4 in not registering the F.I.R. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that, during the pendency of the writ petition, the police have registered the complaint of the petitioner as a case in crime No.140 of 2018. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. 2. 3. 4. Sd/-B.PRASADA RAO assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. K. SUBRAHMANYAM, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCS to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Two CCS to GP FOR REVENUE. High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. Three C.D.Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED; 10/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.44651 of 2018 5 ?iJ0MI)25 m P» Current sieciion . ^ CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS