1 2025:CGHC:47679-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2917 of 2025 Mithlesh Kumar Sahu S/o Late Lalaram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o Village And Post Hardi, P.S. Gunderdehi, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, P.S. Gunderdehi, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2. XYZ (Prosecutrix/complainant) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate For Respondents/ State: Mr. Sangarsh Pandey, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 17/09/2025 1. Heard Mr. T.K. Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate for the respondents/ State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.09.18 10:19:39 +0530 2 “I. Allow this petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. filed by the petitioner. II. Quash the impugned FIR dated 14.03.2025 bearing Crime No. 52/2025 registered at Police Station, Gunderdehi, District-Balod (C.G.) for the offence U/s 69, 115(2) of Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the petitioner (as per charge). III. Quash the impugned Final Report No. 79/2025 filed by Police Station, Gunderdehi, District-Balod before the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Balod (Annexure P/1) against the petitioner. IV. Quash the cognizance order dated 14.05.2025 (Annexure P/2) and entire criminal proceedings pending in Special Sessions Case No. 33/2025 before the learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Balod, District-Balod against the petitioner. V. Gran any other relief, which may be deemed fit in given facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is every likelihood that the matter will be compromised between the 3 parties. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 5. Learned State counsel has no objection. 6. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 7. Certified copies of the documents, if any, may be returned to the petitioner after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti