Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43514 (RAJ)

RAMNIWAS S/O LATE RAMPRATAP v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14013/2025 · 2025-12-04

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49272] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14013/2025 Ramniwas S/o Late Rampratap, aged about 52 Years, R/o Bhopalpura, Police Station Sadar, District Neemkathana, District Sikar, At Present Head Constable No. 15, Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajeet Singh Shaktawat with Mr. Subhash Sharma, Mr. Adil Kureshi & Ms. Kavita Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/12/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.260/2025 registered at Police Station C.P.S. Jaipur, ACB District, for offence punishable under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that false recovery of Rs.15,000/- has been shown from the possession of the petitioner. It is contended that charge-sheet has been filed in this case and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:49272] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14013/2025] 03.10.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Ramniwas S/o Late Rampratap shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /16