[2025:RJ-JP:51469] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20074/2025 Bunty Son Of Shri Chhote Lal, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 19, Harijan Bada Mohalla, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Local Self Bodies, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 2. Dy. Secretary (Administration), Department Of Local Self Bodies, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Dy. Director (Administration), Department Of Local Self Bodies, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Commissioner, Nagar Parishad Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma Ms. Saroj Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i) to call for the petitioner in selection process and give appoint the petitioner on the post of sweeper with all consequential benefits ii) Respondents may be directed not to take any prejudicial action against the petitioner on account of approaching this Hon’ble Court by filing this writ petition. [2025:RJ-JP:51469] (2 of 3) [CW-20074/2025] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 07.09.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12762/2018 titled as Sunil and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Akhil Bhartiya Valmiki Samaj Arakshan Samajik Shodh and Vikas Samiti Vs. State of Rajasthan 2018 Supreme(Raj) 852 (DB CWP No.13187/2018). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of ratio laid down in case of Sunil and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Akhil Bhartiya Valmiki Samaj Arakshan Samajik Shodh and Vikas Samiti (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Sunil and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Akhil Bhartiya Valmiki Samaj Arakshan Samajik Shodh and Vikas Samiti (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are [2025:RJ-JP:51469] (3 of 3) [CW-20074/2025] under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /118