Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43512 (RAJ)

IMRAN S/O FAIM KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14866/2025 · 2025-11-14

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45898] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14866/2025 Imran S/o Faim Khan, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Telghar Tangewali Gali, Nehru Nagar, P.s. Bhimganj Mandi, Distt. Kota City (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail At Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma Mr. Harshit Parashar Mr. Sandeep Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 14/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.219/2025 registered at Police Station Railway Colony, District Kota City, for offence under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is allegation of recovery of contraband of 2.900 Kg. Ganja from the conscious possession of the petitioner which is below the commercial quantity. He argued that though there are nine cases shown against the present petitioner but out of these nine cases, six cases have been decided in his favour. He again submits that [2025:RJ-JP:45898] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14866/2025] petitioner is behind the bars since 31.08.2025, charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, no further custodial interrogation is required, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Imran S/o Faim Khan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg /186