ASHOK KUMAR AGRAWAL v. INDASLAIND BANK (WRONGLY MENTION BAINK) LTD.
CRMP/2527/2019 · 2025-08-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43502 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43502 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:42984
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2527 of 2019 Ashok Kumar Agrawal S/o Nandkishore Agrawal Aged About 58 Years R/o Sawariya Building, Gopi Talkies Road, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus Indaslaind Bank (Wrongly Mention Baink) Ltd. Head Of Branch Through Attorney Holder Arjun Singh Chauhan S/o Ashok Singh Chauhan, Age - 29 Years Office At Dukan No. 53-54, Pratham Manzil (Wrongly Mention Prtham Manjit) Krishna Complex, Ganga Narsing Home Ke Samane, Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent : None Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 25.08.2025
1. This criminal revision has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be allow the revision and set aside/ quash the impugned order dtd. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN
2 23.07.2019passed by the learned 5th additional session Judge, Raigarh in Criminal Revision No. 29/2019, and order to stay the complaint case no.87/2015, till the disposal of arbitration case, in the interest of justice.”
2. From the CIS report of the learned trial court concerned which has been brought on record by the Registry of this Court regarding the disposal of Complaint Case No. 87/2015, it appears that the said case has already been disposed of by the learned IV Civil Judge, Junior Division, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.), vide order dated
14.05.2022.
3. In view of the above, the instant CRMP stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan