Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43499 (BOM)

KUMAR LAHU JARAG v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

APEAL/1187/2024 · 2025-03-27

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.S.Kilaje 924-APEAL-1187-2024 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1187 OF 2024 Kumar Lahu Jarag … Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents …………. Mr. M. A. Chaudhari a/w. Ms. Ranveer Choudhari, Advocates for the Appellant. Mr. Ashok Gawai, APP for the State. Mr. Sushan Mhatre, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATED : 27th MARCH, 2025. P. C. : 1. Heard counsel for the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file fresh appeal, if there is no progress in the trial within eight months. 3. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the appellant, Appeal is allowed to withdraw with aforesaid liberty. ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1/1 SONALI SATISH KILAJE Digitally signed by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date: 2025.03.28 18:22:26 +0700