Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:107900 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5094 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sateesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandra Dutt Counsel for Respondent :- Avneesh Tripathi,C.S.C.,Shivendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to forthwith issue appointment letter to the petitioner after allotting the institution as per the revised select panel list for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher regarding the advertisement No. 01 of 2013 issued by the Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Board, Prayagraj/respondent no.3." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit, but have not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard Sri Chandra Dutt, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Sri Dinesh Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of State-respondent no.1, Sri Avneesh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3 within 10 days from today. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3, Secretary, U.P. Education Service Selection Commission, Prayagraj is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 8.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad