Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43496 (RAJ)

KRISHNA KUMAR MEENA S/O BHURA LAL MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/20010/2025 · 2025-12-18

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51388] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20010/2025 1. Krishna Kumar Meena S/o Bhura Lal Meena, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Goramgarh, Post Kuradiya, Tehsil Jahajpur District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 2. Karan Saini S/o Chhotu Ram Saini, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Abhay Colony, Chhawani, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Prem Shankar Meena S/o Jeevan Lal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Surarikala, Post Barauli, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 4. Jagdish Prasad S/o Gopal Ram, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Village Dujod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 5. Vaibhav Kumar Meena S/o Ranjeet Singh Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Near Ghas Bheru, Alwanpur, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 6. Dharm Singh Meena S/o Ramfool Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Kurigama, Post Leelothi, Tehsil Sarmathura, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 7. Vinay Kumar Mishra S/o Raj Kishor Mishra, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 61, Bara Kumedan Sahab, Bajariya Road, Dholpur, Rajasthan. 8. Anju Goyal D/o Shri Ashok Kumar Goyal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Naya Bas, Pokhara Mohalla, Baseri District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 9. Dinesh Meena S/o Bhoma Ram Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 213, Kalyanpuri Colony, New Sanganer Road, Opp. Riico Kalyanpura, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 10. Sandeep Indora S/o B.s.indora, Aged About 46 Years, R/o 318/29, Naya Ghar, Gulab Bari, Ajmer, Rajasthan. 11. Moti Lal Sain S/o Ram Swaroop, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Vpo Shishu, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 12. Hemraj Meena S/o Madan Lal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Vpo Bheslana, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 13. Rajesh Kumar S/o Kalu Ram Verma, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Khojawala, Post Ghasipura, Vbia Shahpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:51388] (2 of 4) [CW-20010/2025] 14. Chetram Meena S/o Shyoraj Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Kashpuriya, Post Gambheera, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi, Rajasthan. 15. Ramesh Kumar S/o Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Baba Hariram Mandir Gali, Goluwala Niwadn, Vpo Goluwala, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 16. Naveen Kumar S/o Satyendra Kumar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 89, Rajnagar Colony, Near Jain Mandir, Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 17. Swati Saini D/o Lal Chand Saini, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Opposite Patel Public School, Mehandi Ka Bass, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 18. Bhoor Singh Meena S/o Lohadchya Ram Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Milakshraya, Post Sop, Tehsil Nadouti, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 19. Anjali Sharma D/o Shanker Lal Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o B-301, R.k.colony, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 20. Anita Bhatewara D/o Ladu Lal Bhatewara, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 55, Gokul Dham Society, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 21. Seema Meena D/o Kailash Chand Meena, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Vpo Daurawali, Tehsil Dodabhim, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 22. Manoj Meena S/o Brij Mohan Meena, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Khilchipur Meena, Post Nagal Pahari, Tehsil Todabheem, District Karauli. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director (Secondary Education), Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:51388] (3 of 4) [CW-20010/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “i. By an appropriate writ, order and direction, the impugned seniority List dated 17.11.2022 (Annex.7) forthe post of Lecturer (School Education) may kindly be quashed and set aside. ii. By further appropriate writ, order and direction, the respondents be directed to issue fresh seniority list by including the name of Petitioners on the post of Lecturer (Physics, Biology and Commerce) after assigning them seniority against the year 2016-17 and thereafter they may be further promoted on the post of Vice Principal as per their seniority.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents [2025:RJ-JP:51388] (4 of 4) [CW-20010/2025] are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /158