IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8621 OF 2016 Between: Mungati Udaya Bhaskara Rao, S/o. Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 48 Years, R/o. Bypass Road, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by, PrI Secretary, Endowments Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner, Endowments, Dept., Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 3. The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, West Godavari District. 4. Sri Balavenkateswara Swamy vari Temple, Tallamudunurupadu, rep by its Executive Officer, Tallamudunurupadu, T.P.Gudem, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the notice vide No. 46/2016, dt.10-2-2016, issued by the Executive Officer of the 4*^ respondent qua the asbestos admeasuring 60 Sq.yards shed bounded by East ; D.Venkateswara Rao; West : K.N.Road; South : land of S.Suneel Babu and North: Kovvuri Krishna R.S.No.45, bye-pass road, Tallamudunurupadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District, is illegal, arbitrary, usurping the powers of the Tribunal and violative of Art 300-A of the Constitution of in India and the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 as amended from time to time and the Rules made there under and consequently set aside the notice vide No. 46/2016, dt.10-2-2016 of the 4**^ respondent. m. HO: 1 OF 2016fWVMP. NO: 4504 OF 2016) S’ Between: Sri Balavenkateswara Swamy vari Temple, Tallamudunurupadu, rep by its Executive Officer, Tallamudunurupadu, T.P.Gudem, West Godavari District. ...PETITIONER/R4 AND 1. Mungati Udaya Bhaskara Rao, S/o. Late Satyanarayana, Aged about 48 Years, R/o. Bypass Road, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist. ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by, PrI Secretary, Endowments Dept., Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The Commissioner, Endowments, Dept., Boggulakunta, Hyderabad. 4. The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated: 17.03.2016 made in WP.No.8621/2o\6. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 10928 OF 20161 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the asbestos shed and site bounded by East D.Venkateswara Rao; West : K.N.Road; South : land of S.Suneel Babu and North: Kovvuri Krishna in in R.S.No. 45, byepass road Tallamudunurupadu, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District suspending the notice vide no. 46/2016, dt 10-2-2016 issued by the 4 by th respondent, pending the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T. V. JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : SRI KANDA SRINIVASU, SC FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010457052016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8621/2016 Between: Mungati Udaya Bhaskara Rao, S/o Late Satyanarayana, AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.TVJAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2.KANDA SRINIVASU SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (KS AND WG) 3.ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: Mr T.V. Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-K KASIRAO assistant REG achari [ISTRar section officer To, 1. One CC to Sri T. V. Jaggi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Endowments, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] 3. One CC to Sri Kanda Srinivasu, SC for Endowments (OPUC) 4. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:28/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.8621 of 2016 = 2 (I JUN 2025 o\ m* Current DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS